These essential MCQ questions are selected from the most important topics in CLAT (Common Law Admission Test) 2026 for admissions to National Law Universities. Sections include Indian Constitution, Legal Reasoning, Current Legal Affairs, Landmark Supreme Court Judgements and Legal Maxims as per the CLAT 2026 syllabus. For truely unlimited daily MCQ practice, visit Vooo AI Education.
⚖️ CLAT Legal GK
1CLAT is conducted for admission to which institutions?
Answer: B — National Law Universities (NLUs)
CLAT (Common Law Admission Test) is a centralised national level entrance test for admission to undergraduate (BA LLB) and postgraduate (LLM) programmes at 22 National Law Universities (NLUs) in India. The Consortium of National Law Universities conducts CLAT. NLSIU Bengaluru was India's first NLU, established in 1987.
CLAT (Common Law Admission Test) is a centralised national level entrance test for admission to undergraduate (BA LLB) and postgraduate (LLM) programmes at 22 National Law Universities (NLUs) in India. The Consortium of National Law Universities conducts CLAT. NLSIU Bengaluru was India's first NLU, established in 1987.
2Which Article of the Indian Constitution is the "Heart and Soul"?
Answer: D — Article 32
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called Article 32 the "Heart and Soul" of the Indian Constitution. Article 32 provides the Right to Constitutional Remedies — the right to move the Supreme Court for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. It empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs (Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, Quo Warranto).
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called Article 32 the "Heart and Soul" of the Indian Constitution. Article 32 provides the Right to Constitutional Remedies — the right to move the Supreme Court for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. It empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs (Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, Quo Warranto).
3The legal maxim "Ignorantia juris non excusat" means:
Answer: B — Ignorance of law is no excuse
"Ignorantia juris non excusat" (Latin) means "Ignorance of the law is no excuse." It is a fundamental legal principle that a person cannot avoid legal liability by claiming ignorance of the law. Every citizen is presumed to know the law of their land. This maxim applies in criminal as well as civil law.
"Ignorantia juris non excusat" (Latin) means "Ignorance of the law is no excuse." It is a fundamental legal principle that a person cannot avoid legal liability by claiming ignorance of the law. Every citizen is presumed to know the law of their land. This maxim applies in criminal as well as civil law.
4The Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) established the doctrine of:
Answer: A — Basic Structure of the Constitution
The Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) case established the Basic Structure Doctrine — that Parliament can amend the Constitution under Article 368 but cannot alter its basic structure. The basic structure includes supremacy of the Constitution, republican and democratic form of government, separation of powers and judicial review.
The Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) case established the Basic Structure Doctrine — that Parliament can amend the Constitution under Article 368 but cannot alter its basic structure. The basic structure includes supremacy of the Constitution, republican and democratic form of government, separation of powers and judicial review.
5Habeas Corpus literally means:
Answer: A — Let the body be produced
Habeas Corpus (Latin: "You shall have the body") is a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or court. It protects against unlawful and indefinite imprisonment. It is a fundamental safeguard of individual liberty. Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the Supreme Court to issue this writ.
Habeas Corpus (Latin: "You shall have the body") is a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or court. It protects against unlawful and indefinite imprisonment. It is a fundamental safeguard of individual liberty. Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the Supreme Court to issue this writ.
6The Right to Privacy was declared a Fundamental Right by the Supreme Court in:
Answer: C — 2017
In the landmark case Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017), a nine-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court unanimously declared that the Right to Privacy is a Fundamental Right protected under Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) of the Indian Constitution.
In the landmark case Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017), a nine-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court unanimously declared that the Right to Privacy is a Fundamental Right protected under Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) of the Indian Constitution.
7Which writ is issued to prevent a lower court from exceeding its jurisdiction?
Answer: C — Prohibition
The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court to prevent a lower court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to natural justice. It is a preventive writ issued before the lower court pronounces its decision. Certiorari is a curative writ issued after the lower court has decided.
The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court to prevent a lower court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to natural justice. It is a preventive writ issued before the lower court pronounces its decision. Certiorari is a curative writ issued after the lower court has decided.
8The principle of "Audi alteram partem" means:
Answer: A — Hear both sides
"Audi alteram partem" (Latin: "Hear the other side") is a fundamental principle of natural justice meaning that no person should be condemned without being heard. It is one of two pillars of natural justice — the other being "Nemo judex in causa sua" (no one should be a judge in their own case).
"Audi alteram partem" (Latin: "Hear the other side") is a fundamental principle of natural justice meaning that no person should be condemned without being heard. It is one of two pillars of natural justice — the other being "Nemo judex in causa sua" (no one should be a judge in their own case).
9The Vishaka Guidelines (1997) were related to:
Answer: B — Sexual harassment at workplace
The Vishaka Guidelines were laid down by the Supreme Court in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) to address sexual harassment of women at the workplace in the absence of legislation. These guidelines were later enacted into law as the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
The Vishaka Guidelines were laid down by the Supreme Court in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) to address sexual harassment of women at the workplace in the absence of legislation. These guidelines were later enacted into law as the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
10Under Article 21, the Right to Life includes:
Answer: B — Right to live with dignity and all aspects of a meaningful life
The Supreme Court has interpreted Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) very broadly. In Francis Coralie Mullin v. Union Territory (1981), the court held it includes the right to live with human dignity. Subsequent judgements included: right to livelihood (Olga Tellis), right to education, right to health, right to clean environment and right to privacy.
The Supreme Court has interpreted Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) very broadly. In Francis Coralie Mullin v. Union Territory (1981), the court held it includes the right to live with human dignity. Subsequent judgements included: right to livelihood (Olga Tellis), right to education, right to health, right to clean environment and right to privacy.
Ready to crack CLAT 2026?
Get free daily CLAT Legal GK MCQs. Unlimited practice starts from just ₹120/month.
See Plans — Starts at ₹120